Velocity of Money
Eight Reasons Why Everyone Is Hoarding Cash Now
The velocity of money is the rate at which people spend cash. Specifically, it is how often each unit of currency, such as the U.S. dollar or euro, is used to buy goods or services during a period. It is the turnover in the money supply.
Think of it as how hard each dollar works to increase economic output. When the velocity of money is high, it means each dollar is moving fast to purchase goods and services. This demand generates production. When the velocity is low, each dollar is not being used very often to buy things. Instead, it's used for investments and savings.
The velocity of money is calculated using this equation.
VM = PQ/M
VM = Velocity of Money
PQ = Nominal Gross Domestic Product. It measures the goods and services bought.
M = Money Supply. Central banks use either M1 or M2 to measure the . M1 includes currency, travelers' checks, and checking account deposits (including those that pay interest.) M2 adds savings accounts, certificates of deposit under $100,000, and money market funds (except those held in IRAs). The Federal Reserve uses M2 since it's a broader measure of the money supply. Neither M1 nor M2 includes financial investments, such as stocks, bonds, or commodities. The money supply also doesn't include home equity or other assets.
U.S. Velocity of Money
The velocity of money in the United States is at its lowest level in recent history. That means families, businesses, and the government are not using the cash on hand to buy goods and services as much as they used to. Instead, they are investing it or using it to pay off debt.
Eight Reasons Why the Velocity of Money Is Slowing
Expansionary monetary policy to stop the 2008 financial crisis may have created a liquidity trap. That's when people and businesses hoard money instead of spending it. How did this happen? A perfect storm of demographic changes, reactions to the Great Recession, and Federal Reserve programs have merged to create it.
First, the Fed lowered the fed funds rate to zero in 2008 and kept them there until 2015. That the rate banks charge each other for overnight loans. It sets the rate for short-term investments like certificates of deposit, money market funds, or other short-term bonds. Since rates are near zero, savers have little incentive to purchase these investments. Instead, they just keep it in cash because it gets nearly the same return.
Second, the Fed's quantitative easing program replaced banks' mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury notes with credit. That lowered interest rates on long-term bonds, including mortgages, corporate debt, and Treasuries. Banks have little incentive to lend when the return on their loans is low. Therefore, they held the extra credit as excess reserves.
Third, the Fed began in 2008. That gave banks even more reason to hoard their excess reserves to get this risk-free return instead of lending it out. Banks don't receive a lot more in interest from loans to offset the risk. As a result, excess reserves rose from $1.9 billion in 2007 to $1.5 trillion in 2012. Required reserves grew from $43 billion to $100 billion during that same period.
Fourth, the Fed initiated another new tool called reverse repos. The Fed pays banks interest on money it "borrows" from them overnight. The Fed doesn't need the money. It just does this to control the Fed funds rate. Banks won't lend fed funds for less than they're getting paid in interest on the reverse repos.
Fifth, thanks to the Dodd-Frank Bank Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Fed was able to require banks to hold more capital. That means banks continue to hold excess reserves instead of extending more credit through loans.
The Fed's not completely to blame. Congress should have worked with the Fed to boost the economy out of the recession with expansive fiscal policy. After the success of the Economic Stimulus Act in 2009, Congress turned toward damaging contractionary policies. It threatened to default on the debt in 2011. It threatened to raise taxes and cut spending with the fiscal cliff in 2012. It deeply cut spending through sequestration and shut down the government in 2013. These austerity measures forced the Fed to keep expansionary monetary policy longer than it should have.
A seventh reason is that the Great Recession destroyed wealth. Many people lost their homes, their jobs, or their retirement savings. Those that didn't were too scared to buy anything more than what they really needed. Many younger people went to college because they couldn't get jobs. Now they are paying off school loans instead of starting families. That's kept personal consumption low.
Last but not least are demographic changes. Baby boomers are entering retirement without enough savings. They are downsizing now, instead of expanding families as they did 20 years ago. This all cuts spending. (Source: "" Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, September 4, 2014.)
Velocity of Money Chart
This chart shows you how the expansion of the money supply is not driving growth. That's one reason there has been little inflation in the price of goods and services. Instead, the money has gone into investments, creating asset bubbles.
|1999||$4.63||$9.63||2.08||Repeal of Glass-Steagall.|
|2000||$4.91||$10.25||2.09||Tech bubble burst.|
|2001||$5.42||$10.66||1.95||9/11 attacks. EGTRRA|
|2002||$5.76||$11.07||1.90||War on Terror.|
|2003||$6.05||$11.77||1.89||JGTRRA tax cuts.|
|2004||$6.40||$12.30||1.91||Fed raised rates.|
|2005||$6.67||$13.33||1.96||Katrina. Bankruptcy Act.|
|2006||$7.06||$14.04||1.96||Subprime mortgage crisis.|
|2007||$7.46||$14.68||1.94||Banking liquidity crisis.|
|2008||$8.18||$14.56||1.80||Stock market crash. Bubble in oil prices.|
|2009||$8.48||$14.63||1.70||Obama took office. Recession ended.|
|2011||$9.65||$15.80||1.61||Debt crisis. Gold bubble.|
|2012||$10.45||$16.36||1.55||Treasury yields hit 200-year low.|
|2013||$11.02||$17.08||1.52||Stock market bubble.|
|2014||$11.67||$17.84||1.50||Dollar strength increases.|
|2015||$12.34||$18.35||1.48||Dollar value up 25%.|
|2016||$13.21||$18.98||1.42||Low business investment.|
(Source: " at end of year," St. Louis Federal Reserve. "Nominal GDP, Table 1.1.5, for Q4" BEA.)