Racial Wealth Gap in the United States
How to Close It
The racial wealth gap in the United States is the disparity in median household wealth between the different races. This gap is most pronounced between white households and racial minorities. Whites have more wealth than black, Latino, and Native-American households.
A found that whites severely underestimate the racial wealth gap. They think that black wealth is about 80 percent that of whites. reveals that black wealth is about 7 percent that of whites.
In 2014, the median net worth of non-Hispanic white households was $130,800. The median net worth of black households was $9,590. It was $17,5300 for Hispanic households. has not even been measured since 2000. At that time, their median household net worth was just $5,700.
In seeming contrast, Asian American households have more wealth than white households. But that apparent success story hides a wealth gap within the minority. The wealth than the poorest Asian Americans. It's a greater disparity that white households, where the richest 10 percent owned 121 times more than the poorest 10 percent.
The gap is worsening. , white households saw their wealth increased by 14 percent. But during the same period, black household wealth declined 75 percent. Median Hispanic household wealth declined 50 percent.
One reason for the discrepancy is the number of extremely poor black families. reported that 25 percent of black households have zero or negative net worth. Only 10 percent of white families are that poor. Since so many black families own nothing or are in debt, it drags down average wealth for the entire race. As a result, for every $100 held by white families.
This racial wealth gap exists even among blacks who are highly educated and come from two-parent homes. Black families with graduate or professional degrees have $200,000 less in wealth than similarly-educated whites. These black or Latino college graduates don't even have as much wealth as white high school dropouts. Similarly, two-parent black households have less wealth than single-parent white households.
Until the 13th Amendment in 1865, . Until the Civil Rights Act of 1964, continued segregation in the south. They detailed what jobs blacks could take and how much they could be paid. They created indentured servitude. They restricted where blacks lived and traveled. Public parks, transportation, and restaurants were segregated. Even some towns were off limits to blacks.
These laws were violently enforced by the Ku Klux Klan and . Between 1880 and 1950, white mobs blacks at least once a week for some perceived breach of the racial hierarchy. Most of the lynchings took place in small southern towns where poor white farmers perceived blacks as an economic threat.
In 1935, the Social Security Act from accruing benefits. At that time, most blacks still lived in the South, and they were illiterate. That meant they were more likely to be farm workers and domestic workers. As a result, two-thirds of blacks never received Social Security's wealth-building opportunities.
The mobilization for World War II and the civil rights movement sought to reverse this legal discrimination. It had mixed results.
In 1948, President ordered integration in the military. The G.I. Bill of Rights assisted veterans with housing, education, and jobs. Between 1944 to 1971, it spent $95 billion on benefits. But it was left to the states to administer. As a result, were denied access.
In 1954, the ruled that school segregation was unconstitutional. But , and neighborhoods were segregated.
In 1964, the ended Jim Crow laws. In 1965, the protected blacks’ right to vote. In 1968, the ended legal discrimination in renting and selling homes.
The legacy of the Jim Crow laws created a structural inequality that's been difficult to erase. Despite these laws, discrimination against blacks owning wealth has continued. Welfare programs, such as TANF and SNAP, forbid beneficiaries from accumulating wealth. In some states, they can't save more than $1,000 or than $4,650.
Federal government policies actively promote wealth building. Each year, the federal government offers around $400 billion in tax cuts designed to build wealth, according to the . At least 34 percent of the cuts promote homeownership, while another third subsidizes savings and investment. A 2018 reported that reducing the racial homeownership gap would narrow the racial wealth gap by 31 percent.
The cuts help the wealthy more than the poor. The wealthiest 5 percent of Americans are in the best financial position to take advantage of these tax cuts. As a result, half of the $400 billion goes to them. The middle 60 percent only receive 4 percent of these tax cuts. The bottom 20 percent of taxpayers get almost nothing.
Higher birth rates and immigration mean that minorities are becoming a larger share of the U.S. population. By 2043, black and Latinos will outnumber whites. As a result, the racial wealth gap drags down the average wealth of the entire country.
Between 1983 and 2013, U.S. median wealth has dropped from $78,000 to $64,000. White wealth has increased, but black and Latino median wealth has fallen.
How to Close the Gap
Progressive taxation will help close the inequality in U.S. income. Poor families spend a larger share of their income on the cost of living. They need all the money they earn to afford basics like shelter, food, and transportation. A tax cut will allow them to afford a decent standard of living. It will also allow them to start saving and increase their wealth.
Equity in education would bring everyone up to at least a minimum standard. that the greatest single correlation of high income is the education level of one's parents. Equity would allow minority children to be more competitive with those who live in higher-income school districts. It would give them stronger skills in the job market and for managing their finances. Investing in human capital is a better solution than increasing welfare benefits or providing a universal basic income.
One way to do this would be to establish Child Savings Accounts limited to education or homeownership. The accounts could grow tax-free and not penalize welfare recipients. In 2016, the that a CSA program begun in 1979 would have completely closed the gap between whites and Latinos. The gap between whites and blacks would have shrunk by 82 percent.
A found an inexpensive and effective method. Researchers sent packets to hundreds of high-performing, low-income high school students in Michigan. It invited them to apply to the University, and promised scholarships to pay for all costs. More than two-thirds applied to the university compared to 28 percent in a control group that didn't receive the packets.
Increasing income at the low end of the scale will give those workers an opportunity to save and build wealth. Between 1979 and 2007, income inequality destroyed Americans' economic mobility. Household income rose 65 percent for the top fifth, but just 18 percent for the bottom fifth. If public policy equalized income between blacks and whites, black wealth would grow $11,488 per household, shrinking the wealth gap by 11 percent. Similarly, median Latino wealth would grow $8,765, shrinking the wealth gap by 9 percent.
One way to do this is to raise the minimum wage. Studies show that cities reduced poverty and reliance on welfare.
The Samuel DuBois Cook Center on Social Equity at Duke University suggests a . It would pay for a trust fund for the four million new children born in America each year. It would cost $100 billion or 2 percent of the federal budget. Children from poor families would receive more, while those from wealthy families would receive less. Beneficiaries would use it for education, home equity, or other investments when they turned 18. They could plan their lives knowing this fund was available.
The program would generate more revenue for the government through higher income taxes. They would generate more revenue for local communities through higher property taxes.
To reduce the racial wealth gap, politicians must stop pretending that trickle-down economics works. The Tax Policy Center showed that Trump's 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act would give families earning $25,000 or less annually a $40 tax cut. It would give those earning $3.4 million annually a $940,000 tax break. As a result, it is a regressive tax that will widen the gap.