Trump's NAFTA Changes
The USMCA Would Create U.S. Jobs and Raise Auto Prices
On November 30, 2018, U.S., Mexican, and Canadian leaders signed the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement at this year's G-20 meeting. On September 30, 2018, their trade representatives had renegotiated North American Free Trade Agreement. It must be ratified by each country's legislature. As a result, it wouldn't go into effect before 2020.
After signing the agreement, Trump threatened to terminate NAFTA if Congress didn't approve the USMCA. But House Democrats won't approve the deal unless Mexico brings its labor protection up to par with the U.S. laws. Some Senate Republicans want steel and aluminum tariffs eliminated for Canada and Mexico.
The deal is an important component of President Trump's economic plan. He wanted to lower the trade deficit between the United States and Mexico. In 2017, Americans bought $71 billion more imports from Mexico than vice versa. The trade deficit with Canada is smaller. NAFTA's purpose was to make North America more competitive in the global marketplace. It's the world's largest free trade agreement.
Six Changes to NAFTA Under the USMCA
The new deal changes NAFTA in six areas.
First, auto companies must manufacture at least 75 percent of the car's components in Canada, Mexico, or the United States. It was 62.5 percent previously. At least 30 percent of the car must be made by workers earning at least $16 an hour. That increases to 40 percent in 2023. That's three times what the average Mexican auto worker makes. Autos that don't meet these requirements will be subject to tariffs. The agreement protects Mexico and Canada from any future U.S. auto tariffs.
These changes should create more U.S. jobs for autoworkers. But it could reduce U.S. jobs for cars sold to China. The higher labor costs will make them too expensive. for the Chinese market. It will also increase the price of cars sold in America. It also means some small cars will no longer be sold in North America.
Second, Canada must open up its dairy market to U.S. farmers. It will eliminate its complex pricing scheme for Class 7 products. That includes milk protein concentrate, skim milk powder, and infant formula. It also allows certain cheeses to be marketed in Mexico and the United States. It opens the wine market in British Columbia to American wine.
Third, Mexican trucks must meet U.S. safety standards before crossing the border. That was a win for Mexico. It was promised in the first NAFTA agreement but withdrawn by the U.S. Congress. Mexico must also allow its workers to form unions.
Fourth, the new agreement provides more protection for patents and trademarks. This adopts many of the intellectual property rights negotiated in the Trans-Pacific Partnership abandoned by Trump.
Fifth, U.S. drug companies can sell products in Canada for 10 years before facing generic competition. It was eight years under NAFTA.
Sixth, companies can no longer use Chapter 11 to resolve disputes with governments. The only exceptions are U.S. oil companies. They are concerned Mexico may try to nationalize its oil industry again. But the Chapter 19 dispute resolution panels remain. These arbitration panels rule on whether a NAFTA country treated a partner's overseas investments unfairly. The panels make sure U.S. corporations maintain the rights protected by the U.S. Constitution.
The agreement met President Trump's September 30 deadline. He needed to notify Congress 90 days before signing the deal. He wants that to happen before a new Mexican president assumes office on December 1. But the new president, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, said he has no intention of renegotiating the agreement.
The parties agreed to revisit the USMCA every six years. If they don't renew it, the deal will sunset in 16 years.
History of NAFTA Renegotiations
The NAFTA renegotiations began on August 16, 2017. President Trump appointed U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer to represent the United States.
The three countries had hoped to finish by the end of 2017. Congress needed a text of the new agreement by mid-June to approve it in 2018. Also, Trump's "fast-track" negotiating authority could end. Some members of Congress have threatened to block automatic renewal.
In his first 100 days, Trump threatened to withdraw from NAFTA if Canada and Mexico refused to renegotiate. They were willing because the agreement is outdated. For example, it doesn't address internet commerce. It also needs to incorporate the environmental and labor protections that are in side agreements.
On March 5, 2018, the seventh round of the renegotiations concluded. Progress had been slow.
On May 31, 2018, Trump imposed a 25 percent tariff on steel and a 10 percent tariff on aluminum on Canada, Mexico, and the European Union. In retaliation, Canada imposed tariffs on $12.6 billion of U.S. imports. Negotiators have been trying to move forward despite the angry rhetoric from their nations' leaders.
On July 1, 2018, Trump said he would not approve any deal until after the U.S. midterm elections in November.
Changes Trump Wanted But Didn't Get
The Trump administration claimed the dispute resolution panel eroded the sovereignty of U.S courts. For example, the U.S. Commerce Department accused western Canadian provinces of subsidizing their lumber exports. It claimed they dumped low-cost lumber into the American market. The resolution panel ruled in favor of Canada. The Commerce Department threatened to impose a 20 percent tariff on Canadian lumber imports. But U.S. manufacturers wanted to keep the panel. They agreed it protects their foreign investments.
The administration wanted its trade partners to open up more of their government contracts to U.S. companies. At the same time, it wanted to use “Buy American” provisions to limit their firms from winning U.S. government contracts.
The administration had also wanted to eliminate unfair subsidies. It also wanted state-owned companies, such as Mexico's Pemex, to operate more like private corporations. In 2013, Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto allowed foreign direct investment in Pemex. But the company is a source of national pride, so it's unlikely to be completely privatized.
A March 30, 2017, a draft of the USMCA proposal wanted to allow "snapback" tariffs if a domestic industry was damaged by imports. But some experts claim those provisions were already in NAFTA.
In the past, Trump said he would like Mexico to end its value-added tax on U.S. companies. Trump claims that the VAT acts as a tax on U.S. exports to Mexico. A VAT tax is like a federal sales tax that's imposed on all companies in the supply chain. Mexico charges a 16 percent VAT tax on all business sales, whether it's to other firms or the consumer. When companies export the finished product to the United States, Mexico rebates the VAT tax. But U.S. companies that export to Mexico must pay the VAT tax.
Trump says that encourages U.S. companies to build factories in Mexico to receive the rebate and avoid the tax.
Trump had asked Mexico to end the maquiladora program. This program allows U.S. companies to set up low-cost factories across the border in Mexico to assemble finished products. They then export the goods back to the United States. As a result, maquiladoras became responsible for 65 percent of Mexico's exports and employ 30 percent of its workforce. That undercut American workers and sent jobs to Mexico. NAFTA expanded the maquiladora program by ending tariffs.
What Mexico and Canada Wanted and Didn't Get
Mexico and Canada both wanted increased access for business travelers. They also wanted inclusion of gender rights in the agreement.
Canada did not get the United States to end tariffs on its lumber and dairy products. It also wanted Boeing to drop its lawsuit against Bombardier. The U.S. Commerce Department added a 220 percent tariff on the imports of Bombardier CSeries jets. As a result, Airbus will fund Bombardier's manufacturing plant in Alabama to skirt the tariff. That worsens Boeing's competitive position against Airbus, its biggest competitor.
Mexico was looking for an anti-corruption clause.
How Trump Could Have Easily Ended NAFTA
Trump could have ended NAFTA by submitting a notice under Article 2205 of the NAFTA agreement. He would have to do so 90 days before withdrawal. He did not need congressional approval to do this. Some experts refer to Section 125 of the Trade Act of 1974. It states that the president has the power to unilaterally withdraw from all trade agreements. Others refer to NAFTA's Implementation Act. They argue that, since Congress approved NAFTA, only it has the authority to withdraw. It's uncharted legal territory.
Even if the United States did withdraw from NAFTA, the other two parties could retain the agreement between each other. But it would reinstate tariffs on trade between the United States and Canada and the United States and Mexico. That would raise the costs of imports from Mexico. Before NAFTA, Mexican tariffs on U.S. imports were 250 percent higher than U.S. tariffs on Mexican imports. Trump also threatened to impose a 35 percent tariff on Mexican imports. By law, he can only raise tariffs by 15 percent for 150 days without congressional approval.
Without NAFTA, Mexico and Canada would probably return to most-favored-nation trade status. Canada and the United States would probably reinstate their bilateral trade agreement. Exports from those countries would be assessed standard tariffs. At that point, importers would probably sue the U.S. government for making their costs higher overnight.
How USMCA Affects the Economy
Trump's threat to end NAFTA weakened trade relationships with America's partners. Mexico created a backup plan if Trump made good on his threat to pull out of NAFTA. It turned toward the Pacific Alliance. In 2011, the alliance created a free trade zone between Mexico, Colombia, Chile, and Peru. In 2017, 94 percent of all goods traded in the zone were tariff-free.
Mexico also improved its trade relationship with the EU. On April 21, 2018, the EU upgraded its trade agreement with Mexico. Once signed, it will remove tariffs from almost all trade between the two areas.
The new agreement might help restore some of the 500,000 - 750,000 manufacturing jobs lost in California, New York, Michigan, and Texas. On the other hand, it could raise the price of affected imports for American consumers. Inflation would increase as a result.
The new restrictions might reduce some trade. As of 2016, NAFTA quadrupled trade to $1.15 trillion. It increased U.S. growth by 0.5 percent each year. That created 5 million new U.S. jobs, including 800,000 manufacturing positions. Canada and Mexico invested $240.2 billion in the United States while U.S. companies invested $452 billion in those countries.
The United States imports $294.7 billion from Mexico. That's almost as much as it imports from China. The new agreement won't threaten the flow and price of these imports. They include oil, manufactured products, fruits, vegetables, coffee, and cotton. The only exception is automobile imports.
Similarly, 80 percent of Mexico's exports go to the United States. Restrictions on auto exports might damage Mexico's economy. It could force more Mexicans to immigrate to the United States. These are just a few of NAFTA's pros and cons.