Do You Know Who You're Hiring?

Candidate Background Checking Defeats Resume and Job Application Fraud

Man checks the references and background of a potential employee on the phone.
••• Kevin Dodge/BlendImages/Getty Images

Think resume checking and candidate are a poor use of your time? Think again. During times of economic challenge, and credentials of your becomes even more important.

Fraud is rampant. Job searchers are desperate. Employers are being duped. Why not find out those less than stellar facts about your favorite candidate before you've come to own him, love him, train him, and integrate him into your company, only to find out later that his credentials are fraudulent?

Your review of employment application materials such as , , and must assume that a percentage of your applicants are lying about their credentials and job experience. Experts estimate that 20 percent to over 50 percent of job applicants lie to embellish their credentials.

In fact, Steven D. Levitt, the co-author of "Freakonomics," and an economics professor at the University of Chicago that more than 50 percent of job applicants lie on their resumes. Cover letters are notorious for embellishment and exaggeration. 

An even larger portion of resumes is misleading. They embellish job responsibilities or change actual job titles. They blur dates so the employment record is difficult to follow and confirm.

Employment application fraud is rising. Employers need to screen to discern lying, exaggeration, and enlargement of experience, education, and credentials.

Fake degrees are on the rise; even bogus job references are prevalent in today’s job market.

Additionally, HR offices report an increase in applications for most jobs. This means that HR offices are weeding and investing time and energy ensuring the accuracy of backgrounds presented on application materials.

In addition to fabricating credentials, desperate people will take any job offered for them or their needs. This includes taking jobs such as , night , and assuming unwanted responsibilities. Of course, their job search continues on the sly.

"The  found:

  • "Candidates, even at the highest seniority levels, are regularly embellishing their resumes.
    • "85% of survey respondents uncovered a lie or misrepresentation on a candidate’s resume or job application during the screening process – up from 66% five years ago.
    • "77% said screening uncovered an issue with a candidate’s background that would not have been caught otherwise.
    • "Yet, only 49% of respondents verify candidates’ education credentials today, despite the many headlines in recent years of executive-level scandals involving falsified degrees."

(For additional ideas about places candidates regularly lie or exaggerate, take a look at the whole article.)

Tips for Successful Candidate Background Checking

These are alarming statistics because they come from sources that actually check and save statistics about each area of potential fraud on application materials.

Where does that leave the average employer in his or her candidate background checking?

It’s difficult to save time in applicant review in this job searching environment, but these suggestions may save you the grief of hiring a fraudulent employee. The time you spend on the front end will save you all of the time and energy you’ll spend later addressing unqualified employees. These ideas will help.

1. Review resumes, cover letters and employment applications with a skeptical eye. You can no longer take them at face value – if you ever could. Faked academic credentials are on the rise, too.

2. Ask specific questions about statements made on the resume during your initial  and during the subsequent interview. Ask questions such as: How did the candidate achieve the stated results? What did the candidate measure to determine that he or she had accomplished the stated improvements?

What role did the candidate play on the team that rolled out the marketing strategy? Official title? Unofficial contribution? Careful questioning should reveal differences between stated facts and reality.

According to Cari Tuna in in the "Wall Street Journal," “When managers ask candidates about claims on their résumés, they should look for suspicious behavior. include broad, vague answers to specific questions. Other times, job-seekers refuse to say to whom they reported, or who reported to them, citing 'confidentiality.'"

3. Background checking has become critical. Check every fact including degrees, dates of degrees, degree majors, employment history, exact dates of employment, direct supervisors’ names, , job functions, , and why the candidate left each job. If anything seems suspicious, ask the candidate for details and verify the stories the candidate tells you. Ask the candidate for verification.

4. Check the candidate’s history online using internet search engines such as Google and social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter to see if the applicant’s history online differs, in any way, from the facts the applicant provided in all application materials. If you find differences, dig deeper, or ask the applicant for an explanation.

5. Look into the candidate’s credit history for any position that deals with money, compensation, and any type of financial information. Indeed, I have received an increasing number of notes from HR people who do not want to hire people who have poor credit ratings, period. They anticipate the increase in staff work related to , and more, that poor credit will cause in the future.

6. Call in addition to those that the candidate provides. References he provides are generally positive and will speak well about the candidate. It is unusual to find a reference who says, “No, that does not sound like a job he will do well,” in response to an employer's query (which did happen).

7. Call every recent direct supervisor and ask detailed questions about the candidate’s responsibilities. Cast a wide net to people you know who may know the candidate in her industry and among your contacts. In addition to using email lists to contact colleagues for recruiting purposes, use them to check your candidate’s background.

8. Do perform the same checks on any candidate who has been provided to you by a third party such as a provider firm or a . Even if you have an agreement with the firm about what they will check, recognize that no one will ever care as much as you do about bringing .

Every employer has found cases of fraudulent education, work experience, and several serious criminal histories that included violence, arson, and armed robbery when your temp firm has supposedly double-checked candidate credentials.

9. Establish a no-tolerance policy and track record. If you find the candidate has lied or exaggerated credentials in any way, eliminate the candidacy. If you discover a current employee committed any type of fraud during the hiring process, investigate, and then , if you find the employee was untruthful. Establish a no-tolerance policy as an employer and hopefully, your reputation will spread and will deter fraudulent behavior from candidates.

10. Do that make sense for your job and your industry. Todd Owens, the General Manager of TalentWise, suggests, “Drug screening is important if your applicants are going to be working with heavy machinery (construction industry) or exposed to prescription drugs (i.e. healthcare industry).

If the applicant will drive company vehicles as a part of their job responsibility, checking their driving records is a must.” Additionally, Owens says, “Take advantage of the National Sex Offender Registry database; it's quick and easy and will go miles in protecting your company from hiring a known sex offender, especially if your business is associated with children or the elderly."

Do appropriate candidate background checking to spare your company the negative effects of resume and job application fraud. Time spent in prevention, with thorough candidate background checking, will save you time, energy, and heartbreak.

Learn the facts about your favorite candidate before you’ve come to own him, love him, train him, and integrate him only to find that he and his credentials are fraudulent.