Is Bipartisanship Really Better?
Economic Effects of Bipartisan Congresses
Bipartisanship is a political situation that occurs when two opposing parties work together to achieve common goals. The opposite is partisanship where party members adhere to their ideologies and platforms even when it is destructive to the national interest.
Nonpartisan is strictly independent without regard to political affiliation. For example, the is nonpartisan. It analyzes the economic impact of proposed legislation for Congress. It does not allow the political leanings of its staff analysts to influence its reports.
Bipartisanship is difficult to achieve because the two U.S. parties are so opposed in their economic policies.
Democrats promote economic policies that benefit low- and middle-income families. Democrats believe reducing income inequality is the best way to foster economic growth. Low-income families spend the majority of their income more money on food, medicine, and shelter. This increases demand more than policies that benefit businesses.
Republican economic policies focus on what's good for businesses and investors. They say that prosperous companies will boost economic growth for everyone. Republicans promote the theory of supply-side economics.
Both parties believe in the American Dream but disagree on how to achieve it. Republicans see it as the right to . That's achieved by self-discipline, enterprise, saving, and investment by individuals. Democrats see the American Dream as the right to education, a good job, decent housing, and health care. These differences are what make bipartisanship so difficult to accomplish in Congress.
A found that Americans prefer bipartisanship. They asked people, “What should elected officials do?”
In response, 68% said politicians should “try to cooperate across party lines.” Almost two-thirds said they should “compromise to find solutions.” More than 90% said they should “treat opponents with more civility.”
Voters’ support of bipartisanship extended to bills, legislators, and Congress itself. People supported bipartisan bills almost as much as bills only proposed by their own party. They did not like bills only proposed by the opposite party. As the head researcher, Dr. Celia Paris, explained, “People assume that bills sponsored only by the opposite party are bad.”
Voters like it when their elected officials work across the aisle. They do not see it as being weak or betraying their party’s values. Instead, they perceive the legislator as open-minded, interested in their voters’ opinions, and less self-interested.
The study also found voters had more confidence in Congress as an institution when bipartisan bills were proposed.
The to see if bipartisan legislators were more effective. It used the Lugar Center’s Bipartisan Index for each legislator. The index measures how often members of the opposite party co-sponsor a lawmaker’s bills and vice versa.
It found that legislators who had above average bipartisan scores were 11% more effective than those with below-average scores. They could push their bills further along the lawmaking process.
Unsurprisingly, bipartisanship was especially helpful for those in the minority party. They couldn’t get their bill passed without support from across the aisle.
Bipartisanship helped women the most. They were more likely to reach across the aisle and that made them more effective. This was true even if they were in the majority party.
Some argue that bipartisanship weakens the push and pull that makes democracy work. James Madison argued that the “ were necessary to keep the republic vital. He felt bipartisanship could lead to a consolidation of power that could turn into tyranny.
An example of how was slavery. Both parties supported it until the rise of abolitionists who stuck to the radical idea that slaves should have the same rights as other men.
Examples of Bipartisan Bills
Bipartisan legislation is when the two parties create a bill together to promote a common good. Here are three well-known examples.
The McCain-Feingold Act is the popular name for the . The Act was named after Senators John McCain, R-Ariz., and Russ Feingold, D-Wis. It sought to end the influence of corporations on federal elections.
banned contributions to political parties that didn't go to specific candidates. To compensate, it increased the limits on contributions to specific candidates. It limited how much corporations, nonprofits, and labor unions could advertise using a candidate's image or name.
In 2010, the Supreme Court case overturned Section 203 of McCain-Feingold. It allowed organizations to fund ads that explicitly endorsed or opposed a candidate.
The Court said the Act restricted corporations' rights to free speech under the First Amendment. In effect, it said that the corporations have the same constitutional rights as people.
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 ended a nine-day government shutdown in January 2018. It was negotiated by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D- N.Y.
It imposed by sequestration for two years, Fiscal Year 2018 and FY 2019. It suspended the debt ceiling until March 2019, provided $90 billion in disaster relief, and funded the Children’s Health Insurance Program.
Bipartisan Policy Center
The Bipartisan Policy Center is a Washington, D.C., think tank that actively promotes bipartisanship. It analyzes issues to find a solution both parties can get behind. Its lobbying arm, , advocates bipartisan solutions in Congress.
The Bottom Line
Majority of U.S. voters support bipartisanship as the best way for leaders and their laws to be effective. People perceive bipartisan leaders as those genuinely working for improvement by willing to work out party differences.
Being bipartisan help lawmakers craft better solutions by allowing them to consider ideologies and policies of both Democrat and Republican parties. The McCain-Feingold Act is a bipartisan product that limited huge corporate influence on elections.
Bipartisanship though can be disadvantageous when two opposing political parties agree over negative economic or political situations. A historical example is slavery. It took a very partisan opponent to end this inhumane practice.